Regions: West Virginia

Page Content:

West Virginia Adopted the 2009 IECC and ASHRAE 90.1-2007

In the 2013 legislative session, West Virginia adopted the 2009 IECC and the ASHRAE 90.1-2007, which the Governor has subsequently signed into law. The 2009 IECC will be effective as of November 30, 2013 and ASHRAE 90.1-2007 with an effective of September 1, 2013.

Contact: Don Iverson: don.iverson@nema.org

Regions: Washington

Page Content:

Washington Bill to Place State on Six-year Code Cycle Defeated

SB 5378, which originated in the Senate, died in Assembly committee at the close of the legislative session on April 30. The bill proposed to place the state’s residential and commercial building codes – including life safety and energy codes – on a 6-year adoption cycle. Lawmakers were concerned that extending the code cycle from the current 3 years to 6 years would impact the state’s energy goals, as well as disallow new technologies and construction innovations. Some of the technology embraced in the new codes includes advances in solar photovoltaic design, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, data processing centers and energy management systems. Adopting the most current life safety and energy codes is essential to allow these new technologies to be implemented and keep the State of Washington economically competitive.

The Washington Legislature will likely appoint a Task Force to study the issue of code adoptions before the start of the next year’s legislative session. Representatives and stakeholders from throughout the industry will participate, including building and fire code officials, contractors, labor, manufacturers, suppliers, testing agencies and other interested parties. NEMA continues to remain engaged in this effort.

Contact: Mike Stone: mike.stone@nema.org

Regions: Wisconsin

Page Content:

Wisconsin Initiates Adoption of 2011 NEC

The State of Wisconsin, Department of Safety and Professional Services has initiated the adoption of the 2011 NEC. This is the first step in the process that will be followed by public input and review before final adoption. Wisconsin continues to be a dedicated leader to public safety and economic growth by adopting the most current infrastructure codes that ensures not only the safety of citizens but also enables the latest construction and energy technologies to be used across the state in homes, schools, commercials buildings and manufacturing facilities.

Contact: Don Iverson: don.iverson@nema.org

Regions: Connecticut

Page Content:

State of Connecticut

Connecticut Legislative Committee on Public Safety & Security Removes 6-Year Cycle Provision from HB 6524.

The Connecticut Joint Legislative Committee on Public Safety & Security unanimously amended HB6524 to remove a six year code adoption cycle provision. The committee acted favorably on the message they received from a large constituency within the state comprised of the IBEW, IEC, Fire Marshal Association, NFPA, ICC and local NEMA member electrical manufacturers. Current construction codes establish the foundation for our communities. Extending the code cycle would have placed the state industry at a disadvantage by not recognizing the latest construction materials and current design practices permitted in Data Centers, Residential construction, Manufacturing facilities and new electrical infrastructure such as electrical vehicle charging stations and photovoltaic systems.

Current construction codes are a primary enabler for economic growth. Adopting the latest building codes will drive a more competitive commercial and retail business environment with the energy savings from homes, businesses and industrial operations now available to reinvest in the local community promoting job growth.

Contact: Deana Dennis: deana.dennis@nema.org

Regions: Michigan

Page Content:

State of Michigan

Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Construction Codes, will hold a public hearing to adopt the Michigan Part 8 Rules which includes the 2011 NEC. The hearing will be held on Thursday, February 28, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. in Conference Room 3, at 2501 Woodlake Circle, Okemos, MI 48864.

Contact Don Iverson: don.iverson@nema.org

Regions: Michigan

Page Content:

Electrical and Energy Codes Retain 3 Year adoption Cycle

After an 18 month debate in the State of Michigan over a Home Builder's Association move to extend the code adoption cycle to six years, the state Senate favorably acted on the message they received from a large constituency across the state regarding the negative impact extending code adoption would have had on the state. The fundamental enhancements in building and public safety have been retained for commercial and industrial facilities. Extending the code cycle would have place state industry at a disadvantage by not recognizing the latest materials and practices permitted in an adjacent state such as Data Center design and even electric vehicle infrastructure. The economic benefit derived from adopting the latest energy code will drive a more competitive commercial and retail business environment with those energy savings now available to reinvest in the local community promoting job growth. All of these benefits were retained for taxpayer funded facilities that are newly constructed or remodeled such as schools and government buildings that will recognize the benefit from the energy code by lowering operating cost for those facilities."

"The significant impact may be on the backs of Michigan’s home buyers. If the state fails to remain current by updating the Michigan Residential Code every three years, the impact will range from family safety to energy savings. Sources indicate that remaining current to the most recent energy code equates to a savings of nearly $1000 a year to a home owner. Take into considerations the 10,000 housing starts across the state and that establishes millions of dollars of disposable income for those home buyers to reinvest into the local economy.

Contact: Don Iverson: don.iverson@nema.org

Regions: Illinois

Page Content:

State of Illinois – Energy Code

On January 1, 2013 the State of Illinois adopted the 2012 IECC with amendments. Back on August 17, 2012 the Governor signed Senate Bill 3724 which amends the implementation date of the 2012 IECC to January 1, 2013. It will lengthen the time the Board has to review and adopt future published editions of the Code and make them effective. This will allow stakeholders more time for training and preparation to build, design, and enforce the future updated codes.

Administrative Rules to adopt the 2012 IECC with amendments were approved by the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules on December 11, 2012.

• See the following amendments.

Contact: Don Iverson: don.iverson@nema.org

Regions: Georgia

Page Content:

State of Georgia

Effective January 1, 2013, The INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS [IRC], 2006 Edition, published by the International Code Council, when used in conjunction with the Georgia State Amendments and all other Georgia State Amendments to the INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, 2006 Edition, shall constitute the official Georgia State Minimum Standard One and Two Family Dwelling Code.

Part IV, Energy Conservation (Chapter 11), is deleted from the INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS. Substitute all references to Chapter 11 ENERGY EFFICIENCY with references to the Georgia State Minimum Standard Energy Code (IECC with Georgia State Supplements and Amendments).

Part VIII, Electrical (Chapters 33 through 42), is deleted from the INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS. Substitute for electrical requirements the Georgia State Minimum Standard Electrical Code (National Electrical Code® with any Georgia State Amendments).

When using the IRC; replace all references to the ICC Electrical Code with references to the Georgia State Minimum Standard Electrical Code (National Electrical Code® with any Georgia State Amendments).

When using the IRC; replace all references to the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) with references to the Georgia State Minimum Standard Energy Code (IECC with Georgia State Supplements and Amendments). The Georgia State Minimum Standard Energy Code shall be used for heating and air conditioning equipment as well.

Contact: Paul Abernathy: Paul.Abernathy@nema.org

Regions: Delaware

Page Content:

Delaware Adopts 2011 National Electrical Code^®

The Delaware State Fire Prevention Commission adopted the 2011 National Electrical Code (NEC^®), effective December 11, 2012. This regulation has the force and effect of law in the counties, cities, and political subdivisions of the State. However, any county, city, or local jurisdiction can amend this regulation providing such regulation or ordinance is more stringent or imposes higher standards than those required by the 2011 National Electrical Code and are not inconsistent with the NEC and are not contrary to recognized standards and good engineering practices.

The 2011 NEC is adopted in its entirety with the exception of two amendments regarding the installation of smoke alarms on branch circuits protected by Arc-Fault Circuit-Interrupters. The amendments are the same as those made with the adoption of the 2005 and 2008 NEC. Sections 210.12(B) and 550.25(B) are amended by adding a second, third and fourth sentence to read as follows: Smoke alarms shall not be placed on branch circuits protected by arc-fault circuit interrupter. All smoke alarms shall be supplied by branch circuits dedicated to smoke alarm equipment. The connection of the smoke alarm branch circuit to the power service shall be mechanically protected by utilizing lock-on devices.

Contact: Gil Moniz: gilmoniz@nema.org

Regions: Oregon

Page Content:

Oregon AFCI Proposed Temporary Rule Changes

The State of Oregon Building Codes Division, Electrical and Elevator Board, has issued new temporary rule changes regarding the installation of arc-fault circuit interrupter (AFCI) protection in dwelling units. These changes incorporate the requirements of the 2008 NEC with the following amendments:

• Removes “hallways” as an AFCI covered area and adds “alcoves” as an AFCI covered area.
• Adds an exception to allow installation of up to five branch circuits that are not AFCI protected serving a single system in a single room.
• An informational note is added that explains the rationale behind the amendments to the text of the 2008 NEC.

These new temporary AFCI rule requirements are effective January 1, 2013 . A public hearing will be held February 19, 2013 , and if approved the rules become permanent on June 30, 2013 .

The State of Oregon has an existing temporary rule in place that limits AFCI protection to bedrooms only, similar to the 2005 NEC provisions. This rule will stay in effect until December 31, 2012.

These new rules, effective January 1, 2013, expand the requirements for AFCI protection in Oregon. However, they still amend the 2008 NEC model code requirements and lessen the level of safety provided by both the 2008 and 2011 NEC.

The complete text of the proposed rule changes, State comments and dates of public hearings can be viewed at the State of Oregon website.

Contact: Mike Stone, mike.stone@nema.org

Regions: Wisconsin

Page Content:

On June 29, 2012, Gov. Scott Walker directed the Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS) to study eliminating GFCI, AFCI and Tamper Resistant Receptacles (TRR) in homes without first seeking input from the Wisconsin electrical industry. During this time the Wisconsin electrical inspection and fire safety community mobilized in opposition of this proposal by advising the Governor’s office of their reckless disregard for electrical, fire and child safety in the state by not mandating these proven safety devices.

After reviewing concerns from the fire and life safety community, on September 24th Governor Walker rescinded the proposal to remove GFCI, AFCI and TRR and directed the DSPS to leave in place those safety requirements. The Governor should be applauded for his willingness to change course to keep safety at the forefront for all citizens of Wisconsin.

Contact: Don Iverson: don.iverson@nema.org

Regions: Oregon

Page Content:

Oregon Electrical and Elevator Board Meeting on AFCIs

The State of Oregon Electrical and Elevator Board has added an item to their September 27, 2012 meeting to “review and provide a recommendation on testimony received at public meeting for arc fault circuit interrupter protection”. This was a late submission item on the Board’s agenda and only appeared on their website in recent days.

A temporary ban on the expanded 2008 NEC requirements for AFCI protection was instituted at the May 24, 2012 Board meeting. A meeting was held on August 8, 2012 to receive testimony regarding AFCI’s and whether or not the ban should be made permanent. Written and oral testimony was given by manufacturers, testing labs, NEMA, contractors and installers.

The meeting on Thursday, September 27, 2012 will be to provide a recommendation regarding the testimony received at the August 8 meeting.

Click here for the link to the meeting notice.

• DATE: September 27, 2012
• TIME: 9:30 a.m.
• PLACE: 1535 Edgewater St., NW, Salem OR 97309. Conference Room A
• PHONE: Debi Barnes-Wood, (503) 378-6787

Contact: Mike Stone: mike.stone@nema.org

Regions: Michigan

Page Content:

The Senate Committee for Regulatory Reform has scheduled a hearing in Lansing for HB4561 on September 27, 2012. If HB4561 is passed it will amend Michigan’s code adoption process for all building, mechanical, electrical codes from a 3 year to a 6 year cycle. I urge you to attend this important committee hearing to show your opposition towards this legislation and let your voice be heard. Michigan citizens deserve the most up to date building codes to continue to keep the state in the forefront of electrical safety to ensure the wellbeing of all citizens in the state.

• Meeting Notice: For HB4561  
• COMMITTEE: Regulatory Reform
• DATE: Thursday, September 27, 2012
• TIME: 12:30 p.m.
• PLACE: Room 110, Farnum Building,125 W. Allegan Street, Lansing, MI 48933
• PHONE: Leta Howard (517-373-5314), Committee Clerk

Contact: Don Iverson: don.iverson@nema.org

Regions: Washington

Page Content:

The Washington State Building Code Council held public hearings on September 21, 2012, on proposed changes to the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). These types of changes tend to produce a patchwork of costly regional requirements that vary from other national consensus performance standards. The proposed changes included the following:

1. R101.2 – Scope. Creation of a Maximum/Minimum rule, potentially imposing further costs on construction.
2. R202 – Definitions. Definition of “High Efficacy Luminaire” has been removed, as well as all subsequent references to luminaires in the rest of the code. Code only refers to “High Efficacy Lamps”.
3. R401.3 – Certificate (Mandatory). The compliance certificate is allowed to be posted within 3 feet of the electrical panel instead of directly on the panel.
4. R402.4.4 – Recessed lighting. Wording has been changed to require “certified” instead of “labeled” for air leakage for recessed luminaires installed in the thermal envelope. This requires third-party verification instead of only labeling of the product.
5. R403.1.1 – Programmable thermostats. Further performance requirements for programmable thermostats, including additional programmable setback periods and a minimum 10 degrees F deadband.
6. R403.9.4 – Residential Pool Pumps. A new section has been added. Some of the provisions include: prohibition of split-phase or capacitor start/induction run motors; motors over 1 HP must be capable of operating at two or more speeds; pump motor controls are regulated.
7. R404 – Electric Power and Lighting Systems. All references to “high efficacy luminaires” have been deleted, only references to “high efficacy lamps” remain.

Contact: Mike Stone at mike.stone@nema.org

Regions: Louisiana; Mississippi; Florida; Alabama

Page Content:

To our friends in Alabama, Mississippi, Florida, Louisiana and any other state to be affected by Hurricane Isaac

NEMA and our manufacturers are always concerned for the life and safety of anyone who installs, review and inspect electrical equipment subject to flood and contaminated waters. NEMA has established this guide to help anyone who needs to determine if electrical equipment should be replaced or can be reconditioned under manufacturers’ guidance when subject to events like you are experiencing with hurricane Isaac.

Below you will find a link to our guide that is designed by NEMA with participation from our many manufacturers to help building officials and inspectors better understand how to evaluate water damaged electrical equipment. The reliable and safe operation of electrical equipment is vital to the core beliefs of the National Electrical Code [NEC] and the National Electrical Safety Code [NESC]; this general scope is to ensure the practical safeguard to persons and property from the hazards associated with the use of electricity. The NEMA guide on Evaluating Water Damaged Electrical Equipment assists in playing a role in that well established scope of the NEC.

• Evaluating Water Damaged Electrical Equipment Document

Contact: Paul W. Abernathy, Paul.Abernathy@nema.org

Regions: West Virginia

Page Content:

The West Virginia State Fire Commission has announced a public hearing date of August 24, 2012 in Charleston. The purpose of this hearing is to discuss the adoption of the 2011 NEC which will enhance electrical safety in West Virginia. The State Fire Commission should be commended for their hard work and dedication towards building safety for all citizens of West Virginia.

Date: Friday, August 24, 2012 @10:00am
Location: West Virginia State Fire Marshals Offices
1207 Quarrier St (Second Floor)
Charleston, WV

Contact: Don Iverson: Don.iverson@nema.org

Regions: Oklahoma

Page Content:

Effective November 1, 2012, all commercial electrical construction in Oklahoma will be in accordance with the 2011 National Electrical Code without the informative annexes. The final approval of the Oklahoma Uniformed Building Code Council took place on May 30, 2012. Along with the adoption of the 2011 NEC the council also approved the adoption of the 2009 International Code Council [ICC] editions of the IPC [International Plumbing Code], IMC [International Mechanical Code] and IFGC [International Fuel Gas Code] on commercial construction.

Contact: Paul.Abernathy@NEMA.org

Regions: Texas

Page Content:

Texas Industrialized Buildings Code Council adopts 2009 I-Codes and 2011 NEC

The adoption of the 2009 International Codes and the 2011 National Electrical Code becomes effective for the Texas Industrialized Building Code Council on July 1, 2012. Any building constructed as an Industrialized Building for use in Texas is required to meet these current code standards. However, as a grandfathering allowance any construction plans already approved under previous adopted code editions prior to July 1, 2012 will be allowed provided that the Industrialized Building must be completed, inspected in the plant by a Texas approved third party inspector, and labeled (TX decal must be attached to the unit) by no later than 12/28/2012 or the unit shall not be eligible for a Texas decal.

In Texas, Industrialized Buildings laws cover buildings constructed in one or more modules at a location other than the installation site and designed to be used as a commercial structure when installed. The buildings are closed construction and cannot be inspected at the installation site without disassembling the building or destroying a portion of the building. On January 1, 2010, portable classrooms designed for teaching the curriculum required by the Education Code, regardless of whether the construction is closed or not, are required to meet all the provisions that are required for industrialized buildings.

Contact: Paul.Abernathy@nema.org

Regions: North Carolina

Page Content:

On June 14, 2011 the North Carolina Building Code Council adopted the 2011 National Electrical Code effective September 1, 2011. However, on June 17, 2011, the Rules Review Commission received written objections, pursuant to NCGS 150B-21.3(b2), from 11 persons requesting a delay of the September 1, 2011 effective date. On May 16, 2012, the NC General Assembly convened and adjourned on July 3, 2012 without additional legislative review. As a result of the actions on May 16 thru July 3, 2012, the 2011 NC Electrical Code referencing the 2011 National Electrical Code went into effect July 3, 2012.

Contact: Paul.Abernathy@nema.org

Regions: New Jersey

Page Content:

The New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, Division of Codes and Standards have completed the Electrical Subcode review process. Effective May 7, 2001, the 2011 National Electrical Code with amendments became the electrical standard for all new electrical installations in the state.

A summary of the 2011 amendments are as follows:

Section 210.12(B) Branch Circuit Extensions or Modifications Dwelling Units will be deleted, because it is regulated by the Rehabilitation Subcode.

The amendment to NEC 334.10(1), which permits the use of Type NM cable in accessory buildings or structures of dwellings will be deleted, because the text is now included in the 2011 NEC.

The amendment to 300.4(A)(1) will be retained. This amendment references the building subcode for the placement of cable- or raceway-type wiring methods installed through bored holes in joists, rafters, or other wood members.

The amendment to 334.12(A)(2) will be retained. This amendment deletes this item and permits exposed Type NM cable in dropped or suspended ceilings in other than one- and two-family and multifamily dwellings.

The amendments to the support requirements in 342.30(C) Intermediate Metal Conduit, 344.30.(C) Rigid Metal Conduit, 352.30(C) Rigid Polyvinyl Chloride Conduit, 355.30(C) Metallic Tubing Reinforced Thermosetting Resin Conduit and 358.30(C) Electrical Metallic Tubing, will be deleted, because the 2011 deleted these requirements.

Section 406.4(D)(4), which requires arc-fault circuit-interrupter (AFCI) receptacles to be installed when receptacles are being replaced in a dwelling unit will be deleted, because additions, alterations and modifications are regulated by the Rehabilitation Subcode.

All amendments to Chapter 5 Special Occupancies will be retained.

The amendment to 645.17, Power Distribution Units will be deleted, because the text is contained in the 2011NEC.

Section 680.42(B) will be deleted and replaced with the text from Tentative Interim Amendment (TIA) issued by the NFPA. This section addresses the bonding requirements for spas and hot tubs. The amendments will not require equipotential bonding of perimeter surfaces for listed self-contained spas or hot tubs that meet certain conditions.

The amendment to 800.156 will be retained. This amendment deletes the requirement for a communications outlet in dwelling units.

Informative Annex H entitled "Administration and Enforcement," will be retained. This amendment deletes this Annex in its entirety.

Contact: Gil Moniz at gilmoniz@nema.org

CommonSpotId: 42,878

Regions: Michigan

Page Content:

Will the Michigan Senate Leave Citizens holding the Bill on Higher Energy Costs and Reduced Safety?

The Michigan Home Builders Association continue to single handedly push through legislation HB4561 that will extend building code adoption cycles in the state of Michigan from 3 years to 6 years. In the fall of 2011 the Michigan House Regulatory Reform Committee held hearings on HB4561. After receiving compelling oral and written testimony during two different hearings in support of electrical safety, energy efficiency requirements and the need to recognize safe installation codes for new technologies such as electric vehicles from a wide spectrum of the electrical and building and manufacturing communitys to throw out HB4561, the committee voted to send the proposed legislation to the Senate for adoption. Once again the PRIMARY proponent is the Michigan Home Builders Association.

On April 26, the Senate Regulatory Reform Committee held its first public hearing on HB4561. The majority of the allotted time during the hearing was given to the Homebuilders (MHBA) arguing that slowing adoption will cut costs to the citizens of Michigan. Because of the cost associated with adopting codes that permit the state of the art technology to reduce construction cost and ensure safety is in place for new technology such as electric vehicles that are a growing sector of the automotive industry in the state. The real issue is that home owners and businesses are left holding the higher utility bills for years to come because energy code adoption is delayed. Consider the next 20 years of energy savings that would permit home owners to reinvest that savings into their local economy, but not if the home builders succeed at convincing the senate that short term gains for them are necessary that can be paid for by our kids and grandkids.

The opposition for this bill has extensive support from organizations such as the Michigan Manufacturers Association which includes large manufacturing firms such as General Motors, Ford Motor, as well as nearly 2500 other manufacturers in the state. They recognize that the most up-to- date codes permit the latest technology to bring investment and jobs to the state of Michigan. Without the ability to drive efficiencies through new technological advances, the edge necessary to remain competitive in manufacturing has a significant opportunity to be lost to other states in the country.

The opportunity to help the senate recognize the simplistic cost savings message being touted by the Michigan Home Builders Association leaves Michigan tax payers to pay the price years to come through potential insurance increases, higher utility bills, and lost investments that will impact every tax payer in the state. Michigan tax payers, homeowners and business need to share their concern with their state senator so that a single association does not drive legislation that leaves safety and economic competitiveness at risk. Express your concern to the committee at the next scheduled hearing on May 10, 2012 in Lansing.

COMMITTEE: Senate Regulatory Reform Committee
DATE: Thursday, May 10, 2012
TIME: 12:30 p.m.
PLACE: Farnum Building, Room 110, Ground Floor
125 W. Allegan Street, Lansing, MI 48933
Committee Clerk: (517) 373-5307 sjones@senate.michigan.gov

Contact: Don Iverson, don.iverson@nema.org

CommonSpotId: 42,762

Regions: Virginia

Page Content:

March 1, 2012 the much referred to 1 year grace period has expired and all projects permitted in the Commonwealth of Virginia are to be done under the 2009 Uniform Statewide Building Code which references the 2009 I-codes and 2008 NEC as aforementioned previously.

The Uniform Statewide Building Code [USBC] effectively changed the referenced editions of the International [I-Codes] to the 2009 Editions of the International Residential Code [IRC], International Building Code [IBC], International Plumbing Code [IPC], International Mechanical Code[IMC], International Energy Conservation Code [IECC], International Fuel Gas Code [IFGC] and lastly references the 2008 National Electrical Code. During the period from March 1, 2011 to March 1, 2012 the permit holders could request construction project submittals to be reviewed under the previous [2006 I-Codes & 2005 NEC] adopted and references editions.

Contact: Paul W. Abernathy, Paul.Abernathy@NEMA.org

CommonSpotId: 42,678

Regions: Alabama

Page Content:

The Alabama Energy and Residential Codes Board voted to adopt the 2009 International Residential Code (IRC) for new-home construction and the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for commercial construction. With this adoption new homes built in Alabama will become safer and finally conform to a statewide, nationally recognized standard.

Effective October 1, 2012, these new codes will be in effect and represent the first time the State of Alabama ever had a statewide code standard. It is important to note that a few municipalities have already moved forward and adopted the 2012 International Residential Code and the 2011 National Electrical Code.

Alabama is adopting the 2009 IRC with some amendments to its energy section. For example, compliance with the national standard for producing a certificate stating the insulation R-values, U-factors, and the solar heat-gain coefficients (SGHC) for windows remains voluntary in Alabama. The state deleted the requirement for the installation of programmable thermostats as well as requirements for insulation for slab-on-grade floors and to protect exposed foundations. It also moved up the requirements for R-8 duct insulation and testing for duct leakage to July 1, 2013.

The State of Alabama will allow county and local governments to amend specific provisions within the code where local conditions may warrant. However, the state is against any mandatory fire-sprinkler installation standard for one- and two story homes. This was one area that made the passage of the 2009 IRC so very controversial in many states.

The Alabama Energy and Residential Code Board is made of 17 representatives from construction firms, trade groups, associations, utilities, licensing boards, municipal building departments, and legislators. The states governors office appointed 15 board members, and the Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs provided consultation on portions of the codes related to energy efficiency.

Contact: Paul W. Abernathy, Paul.Abernathy@NEMA.org​

CommonSpotId: 42,671

Regions: Virginia

Page Content:

March 1, 2012, the much referred to one-year grace period has expired and all projects permitted in the Commonwealth of Virginia are to be done under the 2009 Uniform Statewide Building Code, which references the 2009 I-codes and 2008 NEC as aforementioned previously.

The Uniform Statewide Building Code [USBC] effectively changed the referenced editions of the International [I-Codes] to the 2009 Editions of the International Residential Code [IRC], International Building Code [IBC], International Plumbing Code [IPC], International Mechanical Code[IMC], International Energy Conservation Code [IECC], International Fuel Gas Code [IFGC] and lastly references the 2008 National Electrical Code. During the period from March 1, 2011 to March 1, 2012 the permit holders could request construction project submittals to be reviewed under the previous [2006 I-Codes & 2005 NEC] adopted and references editions.

Contact: Paul W. Abernathy: Paul.Abernathy@NEMA.org

CommonSpotId: 42,573

Regions: Ohio

Page Content:

The Ohio Board of Building Standards (OBBS) has announced a public hearing on April 26, 2012 at 10AM in Reynoldsburg. The purpose of the hearing is to consider the proposed changes of the Ohio Residential Code which includes provisions from the 2011National Electrical Code (NEC) that enhances electrical safety in One - Two & Three Family Dwellings. The full text of the public hearing draft containing the proposed rules can be viewed on the Boards website (http://www.com.ohio.gov/dico/BBS.aspx).

The adoption of the Ohio Residential Code would provide a great benefit by increasing the electrical safety of one two & three family dwellings constructed in the state. This action will continue to keep Ohio in the forefront of electrical safety to ensure the well being of the citizens of Ohio.

Date: Thursday, April 26, 2012 at 10:00am

Location: Ohio Board of Building Standards (OBBS)
Hearing Room #1
6606 Tussing Road
Reynoldsburg, Ohio.

Contact: Don Iverson: don.iverson@nema.org

CommonSpotId: 42,553

Regions: Idaho

Page Content:

State of Idaho: Electrical Code Adoption effectively killed.

What appeared to be a positive move by the Idaho Electrical Board last August has turned into a dead end. At that meeting, after taking testimony from several individuals, the Board voted to forward a recommendation to the Legislature to adopt the 2011 NEC without amendment. There was a proposal to send two recommendations, one for full adoption, and one deleting the expanded requirements for AFCI protection. The intent was to give the elected officials the option of selecting either one. The second option was rejected because the Board did not want to be seen as being unsupportive of AFCI protection.

On January 31, 2012, the Idaho House Business Committee took up the adoption of the 2011 National Electrical Code. Previously, sub-committees from both the Idaho House and Senate took testimony on the proposed adoption, and both voted to reject the new electrical code. Because the Committees had only the single proposal, it was faced with either accepting or rejecting it in its entirety. With testimony in opposition from several contractors that grossly exaggerated the financial impact of expanded AFCI protection, plus stories of nuisance tripping, the sub-committees turned down the entire code. The primary testimony was from several electrical contractors and a few homebuilders.

At the Full Business Committee hearing, the Chairman asked for the recommendation of the subcommittee and the reason for that recommendation, immediately calling for a vote. There were several individuals in attendance whom had signed up to testify on the issue, mostly in favor of adoption, but were never given the opportunity to be heard. The vote was overwhelming to reject the Boards recommendation.

While it is still possible for the full Legislature to adopt the 2011 NEC, the reality is that it is a dead issue for at least another year. The Board can take this up again later in 2012, but the opposition to arc fault protection will likely not be less. In the meantime, Idaho will be without all the additional benefits and safeguards embodied in the latest and most up-to-date electrical code available.

Submitted by Joe Andre: joe.andre@nema.org

CommonSpotId: 42,206

Regions: New Jersey

Page Content:

The New Jersey Uniform Construction Code Advisory Board announced the proposed adoption to the 2011 National Electrical Code (NEC). The Board reviewed and approved the proposed amendments to the 2011 NEC recommended by the Electrical Subcode Committee. The recommendation includes the deletion of some existing amendments, which have been incorporated into the 2011 NEC and the addition of others where new requirements were added to the 2011 NEC. Public comments are welcome and should be submitted by March 3, 2012 to:

Amy Fenwick Frank
Division of Codes and Standards
PO Box 802
Trenton, NJ 08625-0802
Fax Number: (609) 633-6729
Email: AFrank@dca.state.nj.us

Following are some of the proposed actions:

Adding a sentence to the current amendment to 210.8(A)(5). The current amendments reverts 210.8(A) (2) and (5) back to the National Electrical Code 2005 text. This proposed amendment will correlate with the existing amendment to 210.8(A)(2), which clarifies receptacles installed under the exceptions to 210.8(A)(5) do not meet the requirements of 210.52(G)."

Section 210.12(B) Branch Circuit Extensions or Modifications Dwelling Units will be deleted, because it is regulated by the Rehabilitation Subcode.

The current amendment to NEC 334.10(1), which permits the use of Type NM cable in accessory buildings or structures of dwellings will be deleted, because the text is now included in the 2011 NEC.

The amendment to 300.4(A)(1) will be retained. This amendment references the building subcode for the placement of cable- or raceway-type wiring methods installed through bored holes in joists, rafters, or other wood members.

The amendment to 334.12(A)(2) will be retained. This amendment deletes this item and permits exposed Type NM cable in dropped or suspended ceilings in other than one- and two-family and multifamily dwellings.

The amendments to the support requirements in 342.30(C) Intermediate Metal Conduit, 344.30.(C) Rigid Metal Conduit, 352.30(C) Rigid Polyvinyl Chloride Conduit, 355.30(C) Metallic Tubing Reinforced Thermosetting Resin Conduit and 358.30(C) Electrical Metallic Tubing, will be deleted, because the 2011 deleted these requirements.

Section 406.4(D)(4), which requires arc-fault circuit-interrupter (AFCI) receptacles to be installed when receptacles are being replaced in a dwelling unit will be deleted, because additions, alterations and modifications are regulated by the Rehabilitation Subcode.

All current amendments to Chapter 5 Special Occupancies will be retained.

The amendment to 645.17, Power Distribution Units will be deleted, because the text is contained in the 2011NEC.

Section 680.42(B) will be deleted and replaced with the text from Tentative Interim Amendment (TIA) issued by the NFPA. This section addresses the bonding requirements for spas and hot tubs. The amendments will not require equipotential bonding of perimeter surfaces for listed self-contained spas or hot tubs that meet certain conditions.

The current amendment to 800.156 will be retained. This amendment deletes the requirement for a communications outlet in dwelling units.

Contact: Gil Moniz, gilmoniz@nema.org

CommonSpotId: 42,190

Regions: Pennsylvania

Page Content:

At the January 18, 2012 meeting of the Pennsylvania Uniform Construction Code Review and Advisory Council (RAC) the Council voted to recommend to the Pennsylvania Legislature that a six year code adoption cycle be instituted under the Uniform Construction Code. This recommendation will require an amendment to Act 45 of 1999 (as amended), which establishes a uniform construction code imposing powers and duties on municipalities and the Department of Labor and Industry providing for enforcement, imposing penalties and making repeals. The Act also provides for the duties of RAC, which include the review of the latest triennial code revisions issued by the International Code Council. If these recommendations are accepted the 2009 I-Codes that are currently in effect, will remain in effect until at least 2015 when RAC must review changes in the 2015 I-Codes. The 2008 National Electrical Code (NEC) is adopted by reference in the 2009 Building Code and for one- and two-family dwellings the 2009 Residential Code is adopted with Electrical Provisions that are based on the 2008 NEC.

Contact: Gil Moniz, gilmoniz@nema.org

CommonSpotId: 42,154

Regions: Idaho

Page Content:

Idaho Senate is Considering Adoption of the 2011 NEC

TO: Members of the Electrical Code Coalition

The Idaho Legislature is apparently considering a proposal to adopt the 2011 NEC.

Last July, the state electrical board voted to forward a recommendation to the state legislature to adopt the 2011 NEC without amendments. This proposal has worked its way through the process and is currently with the Senate Commerce and Human Resources Committee for consideration. It is my understanding that there is some resistance within this committee regarding support for adoption. Unfortunately, this committee is meeting today at 1:30 pm MST and didn't provide advanced notice thereof.

I have advised the local IEC Chapter of this development and encourage you to do the same with your contacts in Idaho.

Robert W. (Bob) Baird
Independent Electrical Contractors, Inc.
4401 Ford Avenue, Suite 1100
Alexandria, VA 22302
Phone: (703) 549-7351
Email: bbaird@ieci.org

Contact: Joe Andre: joe.andre@nema.org

CommonSpotId: 42,138

Regions: Kentucky

Page Content:

State of Kentucky

On November 30, 2011 the State of Kentucky approved the adoption of the 2011 NEC in the Kentucky Building Code without amendment. Any project for which an application for permit is received between now and January 31, 2012 has the choice to use the 2008 NEC or the 2011 NEC due to a grace period currently in effect. However, the 2011 NEC will become mandatory for all buildings in the state on February 1, 2012.

This adoption will provide a great benefit to the citizens of Kentucky by increasing the electrical safety of new buildings constructed in the state.

Contact: don.iverson@nema.org

CommonSpotId: 41,985