Welcome to the home of NEMA MW 1000,
Magnet Wire, a standards publication of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). This site tells you about MW 1000, how to use it, and gives updates on revisions as they are approved and published.
About NEMA MW 1000
MW 1000 is the world's premier standard for general requirements, product specifications and test procedures for the manufacture and packaging of magnet wire. First published in 1965, MW 1000 is a dynamic document that is continually developed and maintained by the NEMA Magnet Wire Section Technical Committee, to ensure that specifications and test procedures reflect evolving magnet wire end user requirements and state-of-the-art magnet wire manufacturing technologies.
MW 1000 is designed to present, in concise and convenient form, all existing NEMA Standards for magnet wire, including standards for round, rectangular, and square film insulated and/or fibrous covered copper and aluminum magnet wire for use in electrical apparatus. MW 1000 contains the definitions, type designations, dimensions, constructions, performance, and test methods for magnet wire generally used in the winding of coils for electrical apparatus.
MW 1000 is approved as an American National Standard through an Accredited Canvass of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI
Canvass body consists of magnet wire stakeholders including wire and test equipment
manufacturers, end users, government, testing laboratories and others.Join the ANSI Canvass for NEMA MW 1000. It's free! Inquire
What is magnet wire?
Magnet wire (also known internationally as winding wire) is an insulated electrical conductor, usually copper or aluminum that when wound into a coil and energized, creates a useful electromagnetic field. Without magnet wire, electricity is essentially useless. Around 90% of all electrical energy requires modification using magnet wire to be of any use.
- top -
NEMA MW 1000-2016 highlights
The following is a summary of changes from MW 1000-2015 that appear in the 2016 edition:
1) Expansion of part numbering table to include Fully Insulated Wire (FIW)
2) Replacement of dimensional increase tables for glass fiber covered and polyester glass fiber covered rectangular wires with dimensional increase tables E-4 and E-5 from Annex E
3) New Part 2 specifications MW 86-A, MW 86-C, MW 87-A and MW 87-C for Class 120 polyvinyl acetal round and rectangular copper and aluminum wire
4) New Bend method added for determining compliance with Adherence and Flexibility requirements for large round glass fiber or polyester/glass fiber covered bare or film insulated wires
5) Expansion of the wire size range for Dielectric breakdown testing using the Cylinder method, to permit as large as 24 AWG wires to be tested.
The following are items now under development for the next edition, to be published in early 2018:
1) Investigation into harmonizing with UL 1446 on definitions of terms;
2) Amendments to the Cylinder Method for determining Dielectric Breakdown to permit as large as 14 AWG wires to be tested.
3) Investigation into alternative conductive electrode materials to carbon fiber brushes, given the difficulty in sourcing the carbon fibers.
4) Investigation into the correlation of Dissipation Factor test results between the use of graphite suspension vs. molten metal bath electrodes;
5) Investigation into adopting a refrigerant and refrigerant oil compatibility test procedure;
6) Development of a repeated (bi-directional) scrape test procedure, and a re-examination of the existing (unilateral) scrape method to update the description and specifications for the test equipment;
7) Development of DIelectric Breakdown at Rated Temperature and Thermoplastic Flow tests for rectangular wire that tests actual rectangular wire rather than a corresponding round wire.
- top -
NEMA members that manufacture magnet wire
For 2017, the following magnet wire manufacturers are NEMA members:
CONDUMEX–México D.F., México
Elektrisola, Inc.–Boscawen, NH
Magnekon–San Nicolás, NL México
MWS Wire Industries–Westlake Village, CA
Rea Magnet Wire Company–Fort Wayne, IN
- Rubadue Wire Company, Inc.–Greeley, CO
- Superior Essex–Fort Wayne, IN
- Virginia Insulated Products, Inc.–Saltville, VA
- top -
- top -
How to Use Your Hard Copy of MW 1000
In the Table of Contents, the Part 2 specifications are first listed in order according to MW specification number, then by Thermal Class for easy reference to a particular type of magnet wire.
To properly use MW 1000, first, review Part 1 for general information, then locate the specification in Part 2 for the particular type of insulation and conductor of interest. Part 2 is arranged in MW number order as shown beginning on page ii. The dimensions for each Part 2 MW type are provided in Part 1 beginning with Table 1. The specification in Part 2 will indicate the performance requirements to be met and references the test procedures and corresponding test values to be attained in Part 3.
Part 1 deals with general information common to all types of magnet wire found in Part 2, including reference documents, definitions, general material requirements, manufacturing information, test conditions and parameters, thermal class information and ordering information. Part 1 also includes dimensions in both AWG and equivalent metric sizes (in mm) for bare wire, minimum insulation increase, and overall dimensions for all MW specifications in Part 2.
Part 2 has all of the NEMA specifications for the particular types of magnet wire listed in the Table of Contents, identified and ordered by “MW” number. The MW number is followed by a “-C” or “-A” to identify the conductor type, copper or aluminum. These specifications provide all of the performance requirements for magnet wire for various types of coatings and/or coverings. Insofar as possible, the product specifications are complete on one sheet since they are arranged to include only one insulation or covering per sheet. The title identifies the product, for example, MW 15-C, Polyvinyl Acetal Round Copper Magnet Wire, while MW 15-A covers the aluminum version of the same generic product.
Part 3 contains the test procedures to be followed and the corresponding tables of specific test values to be attained in determining compliance with the requirements given in Part 2. The requirements are consolidated with the test procedures and testing parameters for a given property. The Table of Contents provides a useful index of the main test paragraphs, beginning on page viii.
Annex A provides a cross-reference between MW 1000 test procedures and those published by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM International) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).
Annex B provides definitions, requirements, and recommended test procedures for reusable magnet wire packaging, standardized dimensions for spools and reels, and standard formatting for the labeling of magnet wire products.
Annex C provides a cross-reference of MW specifications with those published by the IEC.
Annex D provides the formulas used for determining dimensional requirements, minimum dielectric breakdown voltage, and cross-sectional areas and conductor resistance
Annex E defines the dimensional criteria for ranges of sizes of rectangular bare, film insulated, and fibrous covered magnet wire. These tables provide the general rules and guidelines for various rectangular magnet wire products that are not standard as defined in Part 1. For convenience, cross-references to the corresponding tables in Part 1 are provided.
Annex F provides important information on selected refrigerants that could be used as alternatives to monochlorodifluoromethane (refrigerant R-22), including chemical compositions, boiling points, critical pressures and critical temperatures.
Annex G provides industry recommended winding tensions for de-reeling of magnet wire onto end user winding equipment.
Annex H defines the requirements and test procedures for zero-defect fully insulated magnet wire (FIW).
- top -
Comparison to international standards
NEMA specifications and test methods differ from those published by the IEC. The following is a general summary of these differences:
Dimensions: NEMA dimensional requirements apply American Wire Gauge (AWG) wire sizing, while dimensional requirements in IEC standards apply metric sizing in mm. Therefore the requirements are not exactly the same, but some overlap occurs between the standards. The IEC and NEMA methods for determining dimensions are technically equivalent.
Resistance to Refrigerants: Both the NEMA and IEC procedures use monochlorodifluoromethane (refrigerant R22). Since R22 is no longer permitted in new equipment, investigation is ongoing for identifying suitable alternative refrigerants commonly used in newer refrigeration equipment, to test magnet wire for hermetic applications. The challenge in transitioning to alternative refrigerants is establishing which refrigerants lead to meaningful test results.
Available Specifications: Annex C of NEMA MW 1000 cross-references NEMA and IEC magnet wire specifications. Not all NEMA specifications have a corresponding IEC specification number and vice versa.
Solderability Requirements: NEMA immersion time requirements for larger wires are more stringent than those specified in IEC specifications. The IEC and NEMA methods for determining the solderability of a given wire construction are technically equivalent and both standards recognize the use of lead-free solder alloys upon supplier/customer agreement.
Continuity Requirements: The NEMA continuity requirements for single build (Grade 1) wire more closely reflect the capabilities of present day manufacturing equipment than do IEC requirements. However, closer harmony between NEMA and IEC requirements for heavy and triple build (Grade 2 and 3) constructions was achieved when a new edition of IEC 60317-0-1 was published in 2013, and in the present maintenance work program for IEC 60317-0-1, the requirements for Grade 2 and Grade 3 are proposed to be fully harmonized.
Test Procedures: There is an ongoing effort to harmonize IEC and NEMA test procedures. The following summarizes notable differences in these procedures:
Heat Shock: Differences exist between the test specimen preparation procedures, namely the degree of pre-elongation of wire specimens and the diameter of the test mandrels used for wrapping wire specimens. The NEMA-specified total elongation of wire specimens (pre-stretch + mandrel wrapping) is more stringent than IEC, which specifies only a mandrel wrap.
IEC TC 55 decided not to specify pre-stretching that would result in total elongations equivalent to those in MW 1000.
Dielectric Breakdown: MW 1000 has adopted a shot electrode methodology for determining breakdown of rectangular and large round wires, based on IEC 60851-5. Both MW 1000 and IEC 60851-5 recognize the cylinder method for round enameled wires. MW 1000 is being revised to specify the cylinder method for the same wire size range as that of IEC 60851-5.
Thermoplastic Flow (Cut Through): IEC 60851-6 specifies a single-point method of evaluation. This could be adopted in MW 1000 in the future as a routine test, however for now MW 1000 recognizes a rising-point method as a qualification test.
Bond Strength: The IEC and NEMA helical bond peel test procedures are essentially equivalent.
- top -
End user information
The following information can be downloaded:
Download and listen to the following:
Companion NEMA publications:
- MW 750, Dynamic Coefficient of Friction of Film Insulated Magnet Wire
MW 765, Reclaiming of Magnet Wire Packaging
MW 785, Simulated Insertion Force Test for Film Insulated Magnet Wire
MW 820, Conductor Softness Test Methods
IEC Test Method standards:
- top -
here if you have any questions about this page, NEMA or magnet wire standards.